{ "@context": [ "https://opencontext.org/contexts/item.json", "http://geojson.org/geojson-ld/geojson-context.jsonld" ], "id": "https://opencontext.org/projects/bc71c724-eb1e-47d6-9d45-b586ddafdcfe", "uuid": "bc71c724-eb1e-47d6-9d45-b586ddafdcfe", "slug": "164-the-eastern-korinthia-archaeological-survey", "label": "The Eastern Korinthia Archaeological Survey", "category": "oc-gen:cat-data-publication", "type": "FeatureCollection", "features": [ { "type": "Feature", "id": "#feature-1", "geometry": { "type": "MultiPolygon", "coordinates": [ [ [ [ 22.90734406004035, 37.85772824282726 ], [ 23.00633836886585, 37.85772824282726 ], [ 23.00633836886585, 37.917183907598854 ], [ 22.90734406004035, 37.917183907598854 ], [ 22.90734406004035, 37.85772824282726 ] ] ], [ [ [ 23.01276485734569, 37.7822599934512 ], [ 23.121266016890075, 37.7822599934512 ], [ 23.121266016890075, 37.840782547683176 ], [ 23.01276485734569, 37.840782547683176 ], [ 23.01276485734569, 37.7822599934512 ] ] ] ], "id": "#feature-geom-bc71c724-4334-e489-43a7-fd383f3045cd" }, "properties": { "id": "#feature-props-1", "href": "https://opencontext.org/projects/bc71c724-eb1e-47d6-9d45-b586ddafdcfe", "type": "oc-gen:general-time-space", "reference_type": "specified", "location_precision_note": "Location data available with no intentional reduction in precision, and no documented estimates of precision or accuracy." }, "when": { "id": "#feature-when-bc71c724-4334-e489-43a7-fd383f3045cd", "type": "Interval", "start": "-999999", "stop": "2000", "reference_type": "specified" } } ], "oc-gen:has-files": [ { "id": "https://artiraq.org/static/opencontext/pettegrew-ekas-survey/heros/ekas-hero.jpg", "type": "oc-gen:hero", "dc-terms:hasFormat": "https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/media-types.xhtml#image/jpeg", "dcat:size": 379970 } ], "oc-gen:has-obs": [ { "id": "#obs-oc-default-obs", "label": "Main Observation", "oc-pred:oc-gen-links": [ { "id": "https://opencontext.org/media/08c8f1f3-a41b-4367-bda5-c60cbcbf746b", "slug": "164-eastern-korinthia-archaeological-survey-final-field-report", "label": "The Eastern Korinthia Archaeological Survey: A Report to the Ministry of Culture, 2002", "type": "oc-gen:document-file", "oc-gen:thumbnail-uri": "https://opencontext.org/static/oc/images/icons/pdf-noun-89522.png" } ] } ], "dc-terms:abstract": [ { "@en": "
\n

\n The datasets of the Eastern Korinthia Archaeological Survey represent\n digital materials and objects generated in the course of a diachronic,\n intensive pedestrian survey of the eastern territory of Corinth, Greece.\n Fieldwork and study occurred between 1997 and 2020, but the major phase of\n data collection and fieldwork took place in the seasons between 1999 and\n 2002. Work focused primarily on the archaeologically-rich region of the\n Corinthian Isthmus including areas near the known prehistoric settlements\n at Yiriza, Gonia, and Rachi Boska/Perdikaria; south and west of the\n Panhellenic sanctuary site of Isthmia; north and west of the harbor of\n Kenchreai; and east of the modern villages of Examilia and Xylokeriza. Some\n limited survey was also carried out in the eastern passes of Mt. Oneion,\n the Saronic coastal zones of Vigla and Vayia, and the inland Corinthian\n valley of Lakka Skoutara between Sophiko and Korphos. The bulk of fieldwork\n focused on the high-density and artifact-rich zones of the Isthmus, the\n suburban region of one of the most important cities of ancient Greece. The\n project’s initial research questions concerned the nature of Corinthian\n control of its eastern territory, the region’s connectedness and\n orientation to trade networks, and responsiveness to external forces of\n controls in all periods.\n

\n

Methods, Significance, and Usability

\n

\n The Eastern Korinthia Archaeological Survey was a siteless, distributional\n survey, which sought to measure the variable density of artifacts and\n features of all periods across the region through small survey units called\n “Discovery Units” (DUs). Fieldwalkers spaced ten meters apart each walked a\n two-meter wide swath across the unit, effectively sampling 20% of the\n visible surface. Walkers were tasked with counting all pottery, tile,\n lithics, and other objects within their transects to produce a total count\n of objects of different classes per unit; these values can be divided by\n the area of the units to generate artifact density figures per unit.\n Fieldwalkers also collected representative examples of the artifacts in\n their swath through the chronotype system, a method adopted in other survey\n and excavation projects in Greece and Cyprus. Furthermore, teams recorded\n all visible features such as ancient cut stone blocks, Roman olive pressing\n equipment, early modern threshing floors, and modern fieldhouses. The\n greatest strength of these datasets is the analytical power to aggregate\n and quantify artifact data and features, connect data with geospatial\n records, and pattern varying densities of cultural material across space\n and time. Since the distributional data parallels several other sibling\n projects, including two published in Open Context (the Pyla-Koutsopetria\n Archaeological Project and the Western Argolid Regional Project), the rich\n data of the Corinthian Isthmus may be compared readily to other kinds of\n regions surveyed with distributional methods.\n

\n\n

Survey Unit Tables and Objects

\n

\n The survey units listed in the published tables represent different kinds\n of survey and the viewer should pay special attention to the “Class” field\n listed in the Units-1 Table and repeated in the Finds table and shapefiles.\n Most of the survey units, in fact, are Standard pedestrian\n Discovery Unit (n=1,287) that followed completely the principles of survey\noutlined above. However, there are several other classes of survey units: Extensive Discovery Units (n=27), for example, mark a less\nsystematic kind of survey by the Extensive Team; some 19 Revisit-Grab Units mark efforts to collect more\n information from previously-surveyed DUs; Counts Units\n(n=51) are those with artifact totals but no identified finds; and Features Units (n=5) are units where only information on\n features was recorded. In addition, our datasets also include two tables\n dedicated to 88 designated Localized Cultural Anomalies (LOCAs), a\n categorical term reserved for places of exceptionally dense artifact\n scatters of especially interesting features; twelve of these LOCAs were\n investigated through more intensive gridded collection. EKAS made an effort\n to photograph all survey units in consistent ways: the Units-1 and LOCAs\n tables in most cases provide links to digital photographs of units showing\n the area of survey, ground vegetation and cover, and, when present,\n cultural features.\n

\n

Environmental Tables

\n

\n In addition to assessing cultural material across space, field teams also\n collected various data related to the environment and other landscape\n properties that could potentially affect the interpretation of survey\n results. Such data includes not only information about the nature and\n procedures of investigation (e.g., time, place, location, and walker\n lineup), but also current land use, vegetation cover, surface visibility,\n sherd crusting, and background disturbance. This kind of supporting data is\n incorporated into the different tables presenting the survey units. EKAS\n also carried out its survey with a sensitivity to geomorphic differences in\n the region: all Discovery Units respected, at least ideally, real\ngeomorphological units of space (called GUs). A separate Geomorphology table, created by the project’s geomorphologists,\n lists the physical characteristics of Geomorphic Units, such as sediments,\n morphostratigraphy, landscape stability, modern disturbances, and texture.\n The Survey Units-2 Table links to these GUs via its associated\n Geomorph-Units fields.\n

\n

Artifact Finds Table

\n

\n The core of the survey data presented here is the Finds table, which lists\n over 25,000 identified artifacts collected using the chronotype sampling\n system of standard DU survey, or as sporadic “grab samples” during visits,\n or through gridded collection during LOCA investigation. The Finds table\n lists physical and temporal attributes of each object and links to digital\n photographs and drawings when those are available.\n

\n

Geospatial Data

\n

\n Finally, our datasets include separate shape files for all Discovery Units,\n LOCAs, LOCA grids, and Geomorphological Units; recently captured\n high-resolution orthomosaic tiffs of selected parts of the territory; and a\n host of original documentation from the project’s initial survey, including\n the field manuals, forms, and season reports.\n

\n

Acknowledgements

\n

\n The survey was carried under a permit under the aegis of the American\n School of Classical Studies at Athens granted by the Hellenic Ministry of\n Culture and in cooperation with the 37th Ephoreia of Prehistoric and\n Classical Antiquities and the 25th Ephoreia of Byzantine and Post-Byzantine\n Antiquities. Work was supported financially through grants from the\n Institute for Aegean Prehistory, the National Geographic Society, the\n Foundation for Exploration and Research on Cultural Origins, the Ohio State\n University Excavations at Isthmia, and the National Science Foundation. A\n number of universities contributed to research and study: The Ohio State\n University, Florida State University, Yale University, Oregon State\n University, St. Cloud State University, Cornell University, LaTrobe\n University, Bryn Mawr College, University of Texas at Austin, and Messiah\n College.\n

\n

\n A generous grant from the Loeb Classical Library Foundation of Harvard University Press provided the necessary release time in fall 2020 for David Pettegrew to process and prepare original datasets for publication in Open Context. Messiah University kindly supported the publication of EKAS datasets through internal grant funding.\n

\n

Learn More

\n

\n For general information about survey methods and overviews, see:\n

\n\n\n

\n A fuller publication of the project is available through The Digital Press at the University of North Dakota:\n

\n\n\n

Methodological Notes

\n

See below (related publications): Tartaron et al. 2001; Tartaron et al. 2006; Caraher, Nakassis, and Pettegrew 2006; and Pettegrew, forthcoming.

\n\n

Potential Applications of the Data

\n

This survey data has three main applications.

\n
  1. Most of the cultural material was collected and documented through hyper-intensive distributional siteless survey methods, which aggregated artifact counts and collections in a patchwork of small survey units or tracts (called Discovery Units). A dozen areas known as Localized Cultural Anomalies (LOCAs) were investigated with higher-intensity gridded collection. The artifact data itself can be aggregated and tied to associated geospatial data and compared to other comparable distributional datasets from Greece, Cyprus, and the eastern Mediterranean.
    2. \n
  2. The survey was carried out mostly in an artifact-rich environment (the Isthmus of Corinth) and is in this respect unlike more typical studies of remote regions of Greece. It provides a unique opportunity to play with lots of data.
    3. \n
  3. The data is relevant to historical and archaeological studies of well-known sites in the region, including especially the Panhellenic sanctuary of Poseidon at Isthmia, the ancient harbor and settlement of Kenchreai, the prehistoric settlements at Yiriza and Gonia, and trans-Isthmus fortification walls.
    4. \n
\n\n

Current Disposition of the Physical Collection

\n

3,187 physical objects are stored at theIsthmia Excavation house in Kyras Vrysi, Greece, representing 12.4% of the total number (25,646) of identified objects of the survey.

\n\n

Related Publications

\n\n

\n The bibliography below provides a list of EKAS-related publications\n organized by period. Because some publications deal with more than one\n period, a few entries are repeated. This list does not capture all\n publications of later projects that originated out of the Eastern Korinthia\n Survey.\n

\n

\n

General and Methodological

\n

\n

\n Caraher, William R., Dimitri Nakassis, and David K. Pettegrew, “Siteless\n Survey and Intensive Data Collection in an Artifact-Rich Environment: Case\n Studies from the Eastern Corinthia, Greece,” JMA 19.1 (2006),\n 7-43.\n

\n

\n Gregory, Timothy E. “Less Is Better: The Quality of Ceramic Evidence from\n Archaeological Survey and Practical Proposals for Low-Impact Survey in a\nMediterranean Context.” In Mediterranean Archaeological Landscapes: Current Issues, edited by\n Effie-Fotini Athanassopoulos and LuAnn Wandsnider, Philadelphia: University\n of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, 2004.\n

\n

\n Moore, R. Scott, “A Decade Later: The Chronotype System Revisited.” In\n \n Archaeology and History in Roman, Medieval and Post-Medieval Greece\n \n , edited by William R. Caraher, Linda Jones Hall, and R. Scott Moore,\n Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2008.\n

\n

\n Rothaus, Richard, E. Reinhardt, T. Tartaron, and J. Noller. “A\n Geoarchaeological Approach for Understanding Prehistoric Usage of the\nCoastline of the Eastern Korinthia.” In Metron: Measuring the Aegean Bronze Age, edited by K. Foster and M\n Laffineur, 37–47. Liège, 2003.\n

\n

\n Schon, Robert. “Vox Clamantis in Campo: Further Thoughts on Ceramics and\n Site Survey.” In\n \n Our Cups Are Full: Pottery and Society in the Aegean Bronze Age. Papers\n Presented to Jeremy B. Rutter on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday\n \n , edited by Walter Gauß, Michael Lindblom, Angus Smith, and James C.\n Wright, 231–41. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2011.\n

\n

\n ———. “Seeding the Landscape: Experimental Contributions to Regional Survey\n Methodology.” Ph.D., Bryn Mawr College, 2002.\n

\n

\n Tartaron, Thomas F., Richard M. Rothaus, and Daniel J. Pullen. “Searching\nfor Prehistoric Aegean Harbors with GIS, Geomorphology, and Archaeology.” Athena Review 3(4) (2003): 27–36.\n

\n

\n Tartaron, Thomas F., Timothy E. Gregory, and Daniel J. Pullen. “The Eastern\n Korinthia Archaeological Survey: Progress Report 1997-2000.” Annual Meeting\n of the Archaeological Institute of America. San Diego, 2001.\n

\n

\n Tartaron, Thomas F., Timothy E. Gregory, Daniel J. Pullen, Jay S. Noller,\n Richard M. Rothaus, Joseph L. Rife, Lita Tzortzopoulou-Gregory, Robert\n Schon, William R. Caraher, David K. Pettegrew, Dimitri Nakassis, “The\n Eastern Korinthia Archaeological Survey: Integrated Methods for a Dynamic\n Landscape,” Hesperia 75.4 (2006), 453-523. [\n \n PDF Offprint\n \n ]\n

\n

\n

Prehistoric

\n

\n

\n Nixon, F., E.G. Reinhardt, and Richard M. Rothaus. “Foraminifera and Tidal\nNotches: Dating Neotectonic Events at Korphos, Greece.” Marine Geology 257 (2009): 41–53.\n

\n

\n Pullen, Daniel J., Thomas F. Tartaron, Richard M. Rothaus, Dimitri\n Nakassis, and Amy Dill. “Patterns in the Later Prehistory of the Eastern\n Korinthia.” Annual Meeting of the Archaeological Institute of America.\n Philadelphia, 2002. [link to Open Context]\n

\n

\n Rothaus, Richard M., E. Reinhardt, Thomas F. Tartaron, and Jay S. Noller.\n “A Geoarchaeological Approach for Understanding Prehistoric Usage of the\nCoastline of the Eastern Korinthia,” in METRON: Measuring the Aegean Bronze Age (Aegaeum 24), ed. K.\n Foster and R. Lafneur, Liège 2003, pp. 37–47.\n

\n

\n Tartaron, Thomas F. “The Settlement at Kalamianos: Bronze Age Small Worlds\n and the Saronic Coast of the Southeastern Corinthia.” In\n \n Bridge of the Untiring Sea: The Corinthian Isthmus from Prehistory to\n Late Antiquity\n \n , edited by Elizabeth R. Gebhard and Timothy E. Gregory. Hesperia\n Supplements 48. Princeton, NJ: The American School of Classical Studies at\n Athens, 2015.\n

\n

\n ———. “Between and Beyond: Political Economy in Non-Palatial Mycenaean\n Worlds.” In Political Economies of the Aegean Bronze Age, edited\n by Daniel J. Pullen, 161–83. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2010.\n

\n

\n Tartaron, Thomas F., Daniel J. Pullen, and Jay S. Noller, “Rillenkarren at\n Vayia: Geomorphology and a New Class of Early Bronze Age Fortified\n Settlement in Southern Greece,” Antiquity 80 (2006), 145–160.\n

\n

\n Tartaron, Thomas F., Daniel J. Pullen, Richard K. Dunn, Lita\n Tzortzopoulou-Gregory, Amy Dill, and Joseph I. Boyce. “The Saronic Harbors\n Archaeological Research Project (SHARP): Investigations at Mycenaean\n Kalamianos, 2007-2009.” Hesperia 80.4 (2011): 559–634.\n \n https://doi.org/10.2972/hesperia.80.4.0559\n . \n

\n

\n Tartaron, Thomas F., Richard M. Rothaus, and Daniel J. Pullen, “Searching\nfor Prehistoric Aegean Harbors with GIS, Geomorphology, and Archaeology.” Athena Review 3.4 (2003), 27-36.\n \n http://www.athenapub.com/AR/12aegean.htm\n \n

\n

\n

Protogemetric-Hellenistic

\n

\n

\n Caraher, William R. and Timothy E. Gregory. “Fortifications of Mount\n Oneion, Corinthia,” Hesperia 75 (2006), 327-356.\n

\n

\n Caraher, William R., Dimitri Nakassis, and David K. Pettegrew, “Siteless\n Survey and Intensive Data Collection in an Artifact-Rich Environment: Case\n Studies from the Eastern Corinthia, Greece,” JMA 19.1 (2006),\n 7-43.\n

\n

\n Caraher, William R., David K. Pettegrew, and Sarah A. James, “Towers and\n Fortifications at Vayia in the Southeast Corinthia,” Hesperia 79.3\n (2010), 385-415.\n

\n

\n James, Sarah A. “An Olive Press Installation from the Eastern Korinthia,”\n Poster for the Annual Meeting of the Archaeological Institute of America,\n Boston 2005.\n

\n

\nPettegrew, David K. The Isthmus of Corinth: Crossroads of the Mediterranean World, Ann\n Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2016.\n

\n

\n

Roman

\n

\n

\n Caraher, William R., “The Ambivalent Landscape of Christian Corinth: The\nArchaeology of Place, Theology, and Politics in a Late Antique City.” In Corinth in Contrast: Studies in Inequality, edited by Steven J.\n Friesen, Sarah A. James, and Daniel N. Schowalter, Leiden, pp. 143-165:\n Brill, 2014.\n

\n

\n Caraher, William R., Dimitri Nakassis, and David K. Pettegrew, “Siteless\n Survey and Intensive Data Collection in an Artifact-Rich Environment: Case\n Studies from the Eastern Corinthia, Greece,” JMA 19.1 (2006),\n 7-43.\n

\n

\n Caraher, William R., and David K. Pettegrew, “Imperial Surplus and Local\n Tastes: A Comparative Study of Mediterranean Connectivity and Trade,” with\n W.R. Caraher. In\n \n Across the Corrupting Sea: Post-Braudelian Approaches to the Ancient\n Mediterranean\n \n , edited by C. Concannon and L. Mazurek, London, pp. 165-191: Routledge\n 2016.\n

\n

\n Gregory, Timothy E., “Η Ανατολική Κορινθία Στην Παλαιοχριστιανική Εποχή.”\n In\n \n The Corinthia and the Northeast Peloponnesus: Topography and History\n from Prehistoric Times Until the End of Antiquity. Proceedings of the\n International Conference Organized by the Directorate of Prehistoric\n and Classical Antiquities, the LZ’ Ephorate of Prehistoric and\n Classical Antiquities and the German Archaeological Institute, Athens,\n Held at Loutraki, March 26-29, 2009\n \n , edited by N Kissas and W.-D. Niemeier, 4:275–84. Athenaia. Munich: Hirmer\n Verlag GmbH, 2013a.\n

\n

\n ———. “Religion and Society in the Roman Eastern Corinthia,” in Steven J.\nFriesen, Daniel N. Schowalter, and James C. Walters (eds.), Corinth in Context: Comparative Studies on Religion and Society,\n Leiden 2010, 433-476.\n

\n

\nPettegrew, David K. The Isthmus of Corinth: Crossroads of the Mediterranean World, Ann\n Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2016.\n

\n

\n ———. “Corinthian Suburbia: Patterns of Roman Settlement on the Isthmus,” in\n B. Gebhard and T.E. Gregory (eds.),\n \n Bridge of the Untiring Sea: The Corinthian Isthmus from Prehistory to\n Late Antiquity\n \n , Princeton, pp. 289-310: American School of Classical Studies at Athens,\n 2015.\n

\n

\n———. “The Diolkos of Corinth,” American Journal of Archaeology 115.4 (2011), pp. 549-574.\n

\n

\n ———. “Regional Survey and the Boom-and-Bust Countryside: Rereading the\n Archaeological Evidence for Episodic Abandonment in the Late Roman\n Corinthia,” in International Journal of Historical Archaeology,\n 14.2 (2010), 215-229.\n

\n

\n ———. “The End of Ancient Corinth? Views from the Landscape,” in William R.\nCaraher, Linda Jones Hall, and R.Scott Moore (eds.), Archaeology and History in Medieval and Post-Medieval Greece,\n edited by William R. Caraher, Linda Jones Hall, and R. Scott Moore, Ashgate\n Press 2008, 249-266.\n

\n

\n ———. “The Busy Countryside of Late Roman Corinth: Interpreting Ceramic Data\n Produced by Regional Archaeological Surveys,” Hesperia 76.4\n (2007), 743-784. [\n \n PDF Offprint\n \n ]\n

\n

\n ———. “Corinth on the Isthmus: Studies of the End of an Ancient Landscape”\n (diss. Ohio State Univ.), Columbus 2006.\n

\n

\n Rife, Joseph L., Melissa Moore Morison, Alix Barbet, Richard K. Dunn,\n Douglas H. Ubelaker, and Florence Monier. “Life and Death at a Port in\n Roman Greece: The Kenchreai Cemetery Project, 2002-2006.” Hesperia\n 76.1 (January 1, 2007): 143–81.\n

\n

\n

Medieval

\n

\n

\n Caraher, William R. and Timothy E. Gregory. “Fortifications of Mount\n Oneion, Corinthia,” Hesperia 75 (2006), 327-356.\n

\n

\n Caraher, William R. Dimitri Nakassis, and David K. Pettegrew, “Siteless\n Survey and Intensive Data Collection in an Artifact-Rich Environment: Case\nStudies from the Eastern Corinthia, Greece,” Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 19.1 (2006), 7-43.\n

\n

\n Gregory, Timothy E. “People and Settlements of the Northeastern Peloponnese\n in the Late Middle Ages: An Archaeological Exploration.” In\n \n Viewing the Morea: Land and People in the Late Medieval Peloponnese\n \n , edited by Sharon E. J Gerstel, 276–306. Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks\n Research Library and Collection, 2013b.\n

\n

\n Gregory, Timothy E., and Lita Tzortzopoulou-Gregory. “Archaeological Survey\n and Understanding the Rural Landscape in Byzantine Greece: Some Specific\n Examples.” Journal of Greek Archaeology 5 (2020), 514-527.\n

\n

\n Pettegrew, David K. “Regional Survey and the Boom-and-Bust Countryside:\n Re-Reading the Archaeological Evidence for Episodic Abandonment in the Late\n Roman Corinthia.” Edited by Kostis Kourelis and William R. Caraher.\n \n International Journal of Historical Archaeology. “Special Issue: The\n Abandoned Countryside: (Re)Settlement in the Archaeological Narrative\n of Post-Classical Greece”\n \n 14, no. 2 (June 2010): 215–29.\n

\n

\n \n

\n

\n

Modern

\n

\n

\nDiacopoulos, Lita. “The Archaeology of Modern Greece.” In Mediterranean Archaeological Landscapes: Current Issues, edited by\n Effie-Fotini Athanassopoulos and LuAnn Wandsnider, Philadelphia: University\n of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, 2004.\n

\n

\n Gregory, Timothy E. “Contrasting Impressions of Land Use in Early Modern\n Greece: The Eastern Corinthia and Kythera.” In\n \n Between Venice and Istanbul: Colonial Landscapes in Early Modern Greece\n \n , edited by Siriol Davies and Jack L. Davis, 40:173–98. Hesperia\n Supplements, 2007.\n

\n

\n Kourelis, Kostis, and David K. Pettegrew. “Washingtonia: An American\n Refugee Camp in Revolutionary Greece.” In\n \n The Greek Revolution (1821-1829) Through American Eyes. A Bicentennial\n Traveling and Online Exhibition\n \n , edited by Tom Papademetriou and Nicholas Ganson. 2021.\n \n https://www.greekrevolution.org/\n \n

\n

\n Pettegrew, David K., and William R. Caraher. “Life in Abandonment: The\nVillage of Lakka Skoutara, Corinthia.” In Deserted Villages: Perspectives from the Eastern Mediterranean,\n edited by Rebecca Seifried and Deborah Brown Stewart, 255–303. Grand Forks,\n ND: The Digital Press at The University of North Dakota, 2021.\n

\n

\n Tzortzopoulou-Gregory, Lita. “Remembering and Forgetting: The Relationship\n Between Memory and the Abandonment of Graves in Nineteenth- and\n Twentieth-Century Greek Cemeteries.” IJHA 14.2 (2010): 285–301.\n

\n

\n ———. “Cemeteries in the Countryside: An Archaeological Investigation of the\n Modern Mortuary Landscape in the Eastern Corinthia and Northern Kythera.”\n In\n \n Archaeology and History in Roman, Medieval and Post-Medieval Greece\n \n , edited by William R. Caraher, Linda Jones Hall, and R. Scott Moore,\n 307–44. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2008.\n

\n

\n ———. “Commemoration and Neglect in Modern Greek Consciousness: The Search\n for Identity in the Mortuary Landscape of Rural Greece. An Archaeological\n Study of Cemeteries in the Eastern Korinthia and Northern Kythera, Greece.”\n Ph.D., La Trobe University, 2008.\n

\n

\n Tzortzopoulou-Gregory, Lita, and Joseph L. Rife. “Epilogue: Kyras Vrysi,\n Ayios Ioannis Prodromos, and Its Cemetery.” In\n\n Isthmia: Excavations Volume IX, The Roman and Byzantine Graves and Human\n Remains\n\n , 146–52. Princeton: American School of Classical Studies at Athens, 2012.\n

\n\n
" } ], "dc-terms:description": [ { "@en": "Datasets of an intensive pedestrian survey and regional study of the eastern Corinthia, Greece" } ], "dc-terms:hasPart": [ { "id": "https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10502689", "slug": "doi-10-5281-zenodo-10502689", "label": "The Eastern Korinthia Archaeological Survey [Aggregated Media Files (1) from Open Context]" } ], "dc-terms:creator": [ { "id": "https://opencontext.org/persons/01b146ea-9654-4a13-fe59-dea17a785efe", "slug": "42-david-k-pettegrew", "label": "David K. Pettegrew", "type": "https://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_Person" }, { "id": "https://opencontext.org/persons/5653da47-bfc6-47c3-a40d-36b306ccce01", "slug": "164-timothy-e-gregory", "label": "Timothy E Gregory", "type": "https://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_Person" }, { "id": "https://opencontext.org/persons/12381811-c322-4acc-aa21-8c09563ddc8e", "slug": "164-daniel-j-pullen", "label": "Daniel J Pullen", "type": "https://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_Person" }, { "id": "https://opencontext.org/persons/278ab53c-e94a-4562-acd3-c29c76fd9c8b", "slug": "164-richard-rothaus", "label": "Richard Rothaus", "type": "https://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_Person" }, { "id": "https://opencontext.org/persons/f6759704-16f0-4a6e-90e0-a9cd7275059e", "slug": "164-thomas-f-tartaron", "label": "Thomas F Tartaron", "type": "https://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_Person" } ], "dc-terms:subject": [ { "id": "https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh94001190", "slug": "loc-sh-sh94001190", "label": "Landscape archaeology" } ], "dc-terms:license": [ { "id": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0", "slug": "cc-by-4", "label": "Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)" } ], "dc-terms:title": "The Eastern Korinthia Archaeological Survey", "dc-terms:issued": "2021-06-04", "dc-terms:modified": "2021-11-26", "dc-terms:isPartOf": [ { "id": "https://opencontext.org/projects/00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001", "slug": "open-context", "label": "Open Context" } ], "dc-terms:identifier": [ "https://doi.org/10.6078/M7SF2T9Q", "https://n2t.net/ark:/28722/k25d97c30" ] }