{
    "@context": [
        "https://opencontext.org/contexts/item.json",
        "http://geojson.org/geojson-ld/geojson-context.jsonld"
    ],
    "id": "https://opencontext.org/projects/7249cc84-7cfb-4c30-9499-7e50751bfee1",
    "uuid": "7249cc84-7cfb-4c30-9499-7e50751bfee1",
    "slug": "205-meroitic-funerary-amulets",
    "label": "Meroitic Funerary Amulets",
    "oc-gen:has-files": [
        {
            "id": "https://artiraq.org/static/opencontext/meroitic-amulets/heros/meroitic-amulets-hero.png",
            "type": "oc-gen:hero",
            "dc-terms:hasFormat": "https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/image/png",
            "dcat:size": 941215
        }
    ],
    "oc-gen:has-obs": [],
    "dc-terms:description": [
        {
            "@en": "Data related to an interdisciplinary investigation of adaptation and cultural entanglement"
        }
    ],
    "dc-terms:abstract": [
        {
            "@en": "<div>\n<h3>Project Abstract and Introduction</h3>\n<p>\n    This study presents the first comprehensive analysis of Meroitic funerary\n    amulets, integrating typological classification, comparative research,\n    archaeometric investigations, and ethnoarchaeological perspectives. By\n    combining these interdisciplinary approaches, the research clarifies the\n    distribution, production techniques, and cultural significance of these\n    amulets across the Meroitic period. It further situates the artifacts within\n    broader regional and temporal contexts, offering new insights into funerary\n    practices, technological traditions, and the symbolic meanings embedded in\n    Meroitic material culture.\n</p>\n\n<p>\n    During the last centuries of the first millennium BC and the first centuries\n    of the first millennium AD (<em>ca.</em>3rd BC-4th AD), the Kushite Kingdom\n    emerged in a new center, focused mainly in Meroe (16° 56′ 6.5″ N, 33° 45′\n    2.7″ E) in the fertile Shendi Reach between the Fifth and Sixth Cataracts of\n    the Nile, and established its control of extensive areas of the Middle Nile\n    and its hinterlands. The construction of the Meroitic Kingdom was testified\n    by many aspects, which were described by scholars1 as the most extensive\n    political structure of the region and was almost certainly the greatest\n    state hitherto in existence in sub-Saharan Africa during this period. In\n    Lower Nubia, Faras (22° 12′ 0″ N, 31° 27′ 36″ E) then Karanog (22° 43'\n    20.9\"N, 32° 05' 14.5\"E) were provincial administrative centers with major\n    public buildings and rich cemetery, while Philae (24° 00' 46.2\"N, 32° 52'\n    39.3\"E) and Qasr Ibrim (22° 38′ 59″ N, 31° 59′ 34″ E) were acted as a main\n    religious center.\n</p>\n<p>\n    Amulets are among the important cultural materials of the Meroitic period:\n    hundreds were found in royal and non-royal tombs, and several were found in\n    the Meroitic settlements and temples along the Nile Valley. Studying\n    Meroitic amulets has been neglected in the field of Meroitic studies., in\n    <em>Meroitica</em>7, Nicolas Millet stated, “<em>There was much discussion\n    on the question of amulets, their real significance to the Meroities, and\n    consequently their significance to us, and there was general agreement that\n    this subject deserves elucidation.</em>” Decades have passed since Millet’s\n    statement, and while continued excavations across Nubia have brought new\n    insights, many aspects of Meroitic culture and society remain poorly\n    understood. Among these, the role and significance of amulets in the\n    Meroitic period stands out as a topic that requires systematic and detailed\n    analysis.\n</p>\n<p>\n    In the last decade, studies and research on the Meroitic period from\n    different cultural aspects changed our former perception of the cultural\n    setting of this period. Despite this great leap in the understanding of\n    Meroitic religion, there are still many topics on a large scale that are\n    being researched. Therefore, creating a multi-stranded and\n    cross-disciplinary approach that combines typology, materials science, and\n    ethnoarchaeology to study Meroitic amulets will shed new light on different\n    aspects of the Meroitic religion.\n</p>\n</div>"
        }
    ],
    "dc-terms:creator": [
        {
            "id": "https://opencontext.org/persons/e314075e-6778-42a7-97c5-40c57d7bf0cd",
            "slug": "205-mahmoud-a-emam",
            "label": "Mahmoud A. Emam",
            "type": "https://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_Person"
        }
    ],
    "dc-terms:title": "Meroitic Funerary Amulets",
    "dc-terms:modified": "2025-12-12",
    "dc-terms:isPartOf": [
        {
            "id": "https://opencontext.org/projects/00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000001",
            "slug": "open-context",
            "label": "Open Context"
        }
    ],
    "dc-terms:license": [
        {
            "id": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0",
            "slug": "cc-by-4",
            "label": "Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)"
        }
    ],
    "dc-terms:identifier": [
        "https://doi.org/10.6078/M75H7DD3"
    ]
}